-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gordon Messmer wrote:
>On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 21:15, David Talkington wrote: >> Edward Marczak wrote: >> >> >Which makes me ask: Have I just missed a way to have samba authenticate >> >through Pam instead of using its own database? >> >> Yes, but you may have to roll your own. See --with-pam and >> - --with-pam_smbpass options to configure. They're not on by default. > >Sure they are. I've seen the patches that Red Hat applies for Linux >PAM. Let me clarify that -- they're not on by default when samba is built from official source. Sorry to confuse. - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPJ1uTb9BpdPKTBGtEQLBhwCfV+fIehN3ZPbZr+bsD6MYTRVSh2EAoNBb SZK4hXeEVs4kojOvNmVybDTI =84Qw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
