On 3/24/02 1:12 AM, "David Talkington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 21:15, David Talkington wrote: >>> Edward Marczak wrote: >>> >>>> Which makes me ask: Have I just missed a way to have samba authenticate >>>> through Pam instead of using its own database? >>> >>> Yes, but you may have to roll your own. See --with-pam and >>> - --with-pam_smbpass options to configure. They're not on by default. >> >> Sure they are. I've seen the patches that Red Hat applies for Linux >> PAM. > > Let me clarify that -- they're not on by default when samba is built > from official source. Thanks everyone (less than 10 hours later!). So the answer is, yes, I missed it. Thanks again. -- Ed Marczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. My original point still stands: integrating samba and netatalk is still a bit of a 'challenge'. _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
