So: (1) Would a KDE app run faster directly under KDE than in Gnome?
(2) Why not design all apps like Netscape so they are non-desktop-manager-specific? (3) Are both KDE and Gnome equally "active" as far as support and on-going development and enthusiasm goes? (4) Are there KDE/Gnome warz, or are both groups of developers cooperative with each other? (5) Which is better? :-) doug On 7/29/02 5:32 AM, "Duncan Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Doug Lerner wrote: > >> What does it mean, though, for there to be KDE desktop themes settings >> from inside Gnome? > > Gnome picks up the entire (or almost entire) KDE configuration tree of menus > etc. Desktop themes happens to be in the KDE menu system, so it gets pulled > in. > >> And about the apps, if they run under either KDE or Gnome, why are they >> called "KDE apps"? > > Because they're distributed (invariably) with the KDE system, and they're > written to integrate right into KDE cleanly. If you start a KDE-specific > app in Gnome via a terminal, you might see stuff about a DCOP server > starting. Afaik, that's part of the glue that drives the KDE system and its > apps. > > Netscape would be an example of a non-desktop-manager-specific app. It has > no hooks to either Gnome or KDE. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
