On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Jason Costomiris wrote:
> Of course, I've changed my /etc/init.d/halt script to stop the devfsd
> and umount /dev, but shouldn't these have already been done by RH?
Most people who implement devfs do it in conjunction with /dev, not as a
replacement. Even the devfs docs will tell you that replacing /dev is a
"bad thing"(tm).
You may want to take a look at how it's being implemented in Lunar Linux.
With the exception of failing to unmount USB devices at shutdown, the
devfs implementation in Lunar is pretty good.
--
"The only thing that helps me maintain my slender grip on reality is the
friendship I share with my collection of singing potatoes."
- Holly, JMC Vessel *Red Dwarf*
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
