On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 08:38, Matthew Boeckman wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Not sure about the Network unreachable but I do not think you need a gw
> > on the router since the route is already attached to the network.  THe
> > gateway is to tell a machine ," since you don;t know anything about this
> > network, here is where to send these packets.
> > 
> 
> right, but i still need the default route pointing to the outside across 
> my 4 block to my upstream, correct?

Yes
> > 
> > What happens with just the two interfaces up?
> > 
> 
> same thing, can't ping eth1 from eth0 or vice-versa
> 

Hmm. Are saying that if you try to ping the eth1 interface from a
machine attached to the network on eth0 it does not work?  If so what is
does the routing table on the ping orignating machine look like?  It
needs to be told that the router is the gateway to that network. 


>From the router, can you sucessfully ping its own interefaces on each
network? (ie eth0 and eth1)

> i have that enabled in /etc/sysconfig/network and 
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward is 1. (after a reboot).. do i need to 
> specify it in sysctrl.conf as well??
> 

Nah, if it is 1 then you should be jammin'.

Bret



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to