On Tuesday 05 November 2002 02:01 am, you is done writ:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 12:51:56AM -0600, mark wrote:
> > drop me an email offline. Otherwise, when I suggest to folks that they
> > really *do* need to either upgrade or downgrade,
> >         ->SHUT UP<-.
> > unless you think you can *prove* that I'm wrong, by giving
> > *evidence*, which is defined as demonstrable to an unbiased third
> > party.
>
> But you haven't proven anything except you can't compile a kernel. The
> evidence is tens of thousands of people using 2.96 to build kernels
> every day, as well as other things. Your logic is because your kernel
> doesn't build, therefore the compiler is to blame. How is it many,
> many others do not have the problems you do? Their sources have no
> semi colons?

That comment alone suggests that you are not a C programmer, nor have you 
read what I said: the semicolons were there. The compiler died on a parsing 
error. My source was downloaded from kernel.org, and if I can't trust them, 
then there's no point to Linux being open source.

Oh, and I doubt very much that there are "tens of thousands of people using 
2.96 to build kernels every day". The overwhelming majority are using rpms, 
and the *far* fewer whoare, are using what came with 7.3, or 8.0...or they're 
using the version from GNU, or Debian, or SuSE, etc.

I happen to want to compile the kernel because I'm running on an AMD K-6, and 
would like to have a kernel compiled for it, and with just the specific 
modules I need, not the kitchen sink, or I'd use a binary rpm myself.

Oh - I'd also have taken this offlist, since the argument, if not my warning 
(that was going along with *other* folks' warnings), is getting off-topic, 
but the digest doesn't list eddreses, if you don't put them into your 
message, or your .sig.

At any rate, drop your ego, and reconsider what the rest of us who don't like 
this compiler version have said. You didn't create it, so *why* do you care 
if it causes grief to a large number of the rest of us, and we recommend a 
different release?

End of thread.

        mark

---
On the 'Net 11 years, now at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to