Bret Hughes wrote:
I believe that the ifup scripts will create a route for the subnetActually, the more I think about this.... I shouldn't need to set a default GW (other than what's already there) for the new subnet. It's not like these packets have to be routed anywhere specifically. So, why bother with a GW?
specified in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth? just like it did
for your one interface.
It should not affect the default route at all as that is typically set
at a higher level in /etc/sysconfig/network
The default gateway is only used if the kernel cannot find a subnet
corresponding to the ipaddress of an outging packet on one of the
active interfaces.
--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . 303.442.6410 x130
IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
