Yep. Wake was a decent option as an occasional No. 6 (but was
overused), Aceves was a capable swingman as the No. 7 (but Tito
wouldn't use him), Doubront was ready down in Pawtucket as the No. 8
(but got hurt) ....

How about we keep Papelbon and turn Bard back into a starter?

Steve O

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
> I dunno. I still think it was reasonable to consider Lester and Buccholz as
> a one and two in the rotation, with Becket and Lackey as very solid threes
> and fours. And Daisuke is an above average five.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Ray Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> The whole "suck" problem is back to Theo.  That was a fragile staff. It's
>> not as if they did well last year.  In fact the pitching cost us the post
>> season as well.
>>
>> On Oct 7, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Steve Ouellette <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > It doesn't make for good copy, but yes, they failed repeatedly, they
>> > had injuries and they had bad luck.
>> >
>> > Lackey just plain sucks, and did the whole year. Wakefield is old, and
>> > sucks, and over the past few years has sucked more the deeper into the
>> > season he went. Kyle Weiland has fifth-starter potential, but he's not
>> > ready, and he sucked. Andrew Miller was a good gamble, but he sucked
>> > like he has for most of his major league career. Erik Bedard is a
>> > capable starter with good stuff, but he missed a large chunk of the
>> > season with injury, came back without rehab, hurt himself again, then
>> > came back again down the stretch -- out of desperation, and again with
>> > no rehab -- and sucked.
>> >
>> > All of those guys certainly could have pitched better than they did in
>> > September, but they didn't. It was a confluence of suckiness.
>> >
>> > The loss of Buchholz was huge, taking away an above-average pitcher
>> > and replacing him with sub-average ones. What hurt the most down the
>> > stretch is that Lester and Beckett collapsed. That's the part that we
>> > couldn't foresee. I don't have the energy to look up the numbers, but
>> > I don't think that's been the history of Beckett and Lester. But I
>> > have a hard time blaming Curt Young's  not watching their beer
>> > consumption as the problem.
>> >
>> > Both of those guys missed starts in September with injuries -- isn't
>> > it entirely possible that neither one was at 100 percent, but they
>> > rushed back due to the dire situation?
>> >
>> > I was actually worried about Lester most of the summer. He went on the
>> > DL with the strained Lat in July, and when he got back, Tito
>> > immediately insisted on riding him hard -- with big pitch counts --
>> > even in games where the Sox had big leads, even when the Sox had a big
>> > lead in the standings. He didn't have good command for most of the
>> > second half of the season. Yes, if Lester was in NFL-linebacker
>> > physical condition, maybe he wouldn't have worn down, but he's never
>> > been in that kind of condition.
>> >
>> > I think just plain bad pitching was the reason for the epic collapse.
>> > The pressure once the collapse started certainly didn't help, but
>> > clubhouse chemistry and beer are just scapegoats. There wasn't a
>> > single whiff of complaint in either regard on Aug. 31. It wasn't until
>> > after the fact that everyone started searching for a narrative to
>> > explain things.
>> >
>> > Anyway, glad to see both the Rays and Yanks done.
>> >
>> > Steve O
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Tom Salemi <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Steve, what is your reason for the epic collapse? They tried their best
>> >> and
>> >> just failed...repeatedly?  Just bad luck?
>> >> Yes, the team lost because they didn't play well. But there might be
>> >> things
>> >> that led to that.
>> >> I'm not really buying the beer thing either, but if pitchers strayed
>> >> from
>> >> programs that made them successful in the past than that's a very real
>> >> thing, and a problem.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Steve Ouellette
>> >> <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> There are a lot of successful fat pitchers. Curt Schilling was hefty.
>> >>> David Wells was enormously successful in the postseason. They're
>> >>> baseball players, not athletes, and the whole beer thing is just a
>> >>> convenient excuse for the epic collapse.
>> >>>
>> >>> Steve O
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Ray <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>> I've come to the conclusion that I agree with Tom. The season was
>> >>>> lost
>> >>>> to fat pitchers who couldn't pitch.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> For this I blame the pitching coach who let them get fat.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I blame Francona for protecting our fatsos in the media and
>> >>>> protecting
>> >>>> the enabling pitching coach.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Finally I blame Theo for bringing us Dice-K and Lackey, and for
>> >>>> letting
>> >>>> the pitching staff get fat. I think that the Sox developed a culture
>> >>>> of fame
>> >>>> with no pressure or expectations.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Pressure won't make you pitch better in a game, but it will keep the
>> >>>> beer from your lips and get you to push back from the buffet table.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>>> Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/redsoxcitizens/-/NkMuGU0mLpMJ.
>> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >>>> [email protected].
>> >>>> For more options, visit this group at
>> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>> Groups
>> >>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >>> [email protected].
>> >>> For more options, visit this group at
>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >> Groups
>> >> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> [email protected].
>> >> For more options, visit this group at
>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Red Sox Citizens" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Red 
Sox Citizens" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/redsoxcitizens?hl=en.

Reply via email to