Mario, Response in-line.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 2:39 AM Mario Loffredo <mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it> wrote: > > [ML] I refer to the interoperability issues coming from using different JSON > labels to identify the same logical JSON object.> I understand now and support your approach. Thanks for the example. And strong normative language seems appropriate. > [ML] Don't see great complexity. Consider that basicly implementing the > deprecation process consists in repeating twice the actions needed to support > the pure extension approach. > > I mean, the extension approach requires servers to recognize and support the > jscard parameter for a while and ignore it after the switch. > > Instead, the deprecation process requires servers to do exactly the same as > above but first for the jscard parameter and then for the jcard parameter. However, if you look at this from a client perspective once the client understands JSContact, it will alway set this parameter. But given not all servers will be transitioning at the same time, clients will always need to understand JCard as well. So they will always send both parameters forever. Therefore, the parameters are useless and just add complexity. -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
