Hopefully you’ve seen the recent note from the Chairs agreeing with
what you’re saying.
Please make a call for adoption on the mailing list to keep the working
group informed. The Chairs will move forward from there.
Thanks!
Antoin and Jim
On 14 Nov 2023, at 18:26, Jasdip Singh wrote:
Hello Antoin, Jim,
Given the ongoing discussion on how to negotiate extensions between
RDAP clients and servers (using HTTP headers versus query parameters),
be it for SimpleContact [1], JSContact [2], or versioning in RDAP [3],
Andy and I want to request a call for WG adoption of the RDAP-X draft
[4]. We believe that the HTTP headers-based approach could help unify
extensions negotiation across the RDAP ecosystem.
Thanks,
Jasdip & Andy
[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-newton-regext-rdap-simple-contact/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact/
[3]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-regext-rdap-versioning/
[4]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-newton-regext-rdap-x-media-type/
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
