> -----Original Message----- > From: Gould, James <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2025 8:19 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: [Ext] Re: [IANA #1430284] INSERT "IDN EPP > Extension for the TANGO Registration System" > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > I don't recommend adding the requirement to register the namespace URI and > schema as a dependency to register the extension in the EPP extension > registry. > The registrations could be made a recommendation, but not a requirement. > One issue is that there are many EPP extensions out there that haven't been > registered, where adding more hurdles will not help.
[SAH] Right, this isn't exactly an EPP extension registry issue. It's an extension identification issue, and there's guidance available in RFC 3735. Section 2.2.1 states that standards track extension identifiers MUST be registered. It doesn't say that other extension identifiers MAY be registered; maybe it should. If anything needs to be said, 3735 or 3735bis would be the place to do it. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
