On 8/24/06, Markus Raab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 24. August 2006 04:03 schrieb Avi Alkalay:

> The advantage will  the ability to put value and comment (!!!) in a folder
> key.

Thus means folder keys are not used anymore, and every key has the option to
contain subkeys. It has both advantages and disadvantages:
+ value/comment everwhere
= berkleydb not very difficult to add
- filesys, configuration style, sql and many more backends more or much more
complicated
- how to find out if there are subkeys?

Folders are too Elektra as the zero number is to mathematics. It is a balance point, something that defines structure. Anyway, it is unusual to set values in a folder key, but sometimes needed. Specially the comment part.

 

> And also to be more compatible with the Windows Registry, which already
> lets you do this.

I don't think that compatibilty to other registry, is ANY reason to something.

This will help Elektra API to be used as a frontend to access Registry keys.

 

> Lets close a 0.6.4 version first, then start working on that.

Yeah, lets finish, but I think we should work on the recursive code not in
bindings too, this would have following advantages:
+ not needed to reimplement in every backend (KDB_O_RECURSIVE can be handled
in one place)
+ possibility to have linking code there (because walkthrough of all keys is
necessary)
+ possibilty of mounting backends soon (which would be the best feature).

Lets discuss this in detail past 0.6.4.

We should schedule a formal meeting in a few weeks to discuss things like that.


Regards,
Avi
--
my blog: http://avi.alkalay.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Registry-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/registry-list

Reply via email to