Avi Alkalay wrote:
> Hi Bardur
> 
> There is a desire of having value and comment for folder keys.
> 
> - Value is important for a closer Windows compatibility. This way a 100% 
> portable app can use Elektra API to fully access former keys on the 
> Windows registry.

I'm not sure Windows Registry compatibility is a good goal to aim for, 
but AFAICT Elektra isn't really protable to other _UNIX_ type systems 
yet, so I think it may be a bit premature to worry about Windows 
compatibility :).

> - Comment is important because sometimes is more practical to comment an 
> entire folder than each key separatelly.
> 
> Today the Key struct has the DIR status of  a key instance in two 
> places: in the (value's) type and in the access permissions (mode_t), 
> because this is inherithed from POSIX.
> 
> So the idea is to have only one source of key status (DIR or not DIR) in 
> the access bit array, and use the type only for the value.
> 

Ah, ok. So in this new scheme there is an "unnamed" value associated 
with every directory as well and said value is stored in the key entry 
for the directory? In that case, I guess the change _improves_ 
orthogonality and I withdraw my 'objection'. :)

Thanks for explaining.

-- 
Bardur Arantsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Luck favors the prepared mind.
                                                     Louis Pasteur


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Registry-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/registry-list

Reply via email to