On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:51:36PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> What do you think of the following?
>
> 0x10034 string ReIsErFs ReiserFS V3.5
> 0x10034 string ReIsEr2Fs ReiserFS V3.6
> >0x1002c short x block size %d
> >0x10032 short &2 (mounted or unclean)
> >0x10000 long x num blocks %d
> >0x10040 long =1 tea hash
> >0x10040 long =2 yura hash
> >0x10040 long =3 r5 hash
0x10034 string ReIsErFs ReiserFS V3.5
0x10034 string ReIsEr2Fs ReiserFS V3.6
>0x1002c leshort x block size %d
>0x10032 leshort &2 (mounted or unclean)
>0x10000 lelong x num blocks %d
>0x10040 lelong =1 tea hash
>0x10040 lelong =2 yura hash
>0x10040 lelong =3 r5 hash
You need to use the 'le*' variants, or it won't work on big endian systems.
:)
-Jeff
--
Jeff Mahoney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
