On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 17:40 -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: > Prakash Punnoor wrote: > > > > >. But nevertheless it didn't survive, as like V3, with time V4 became > >slower and slower. In this case no year was needed, but just one month or > >alike. So end of test...but in fact I'll give V4 another go in the near > >future. > > > > > Interesting that it got slower with time. It sounds like our online > repacker is much needed. It will be a priority for after the kernel merge.
I told y'all that last year on the reiserfs-list, with benchmarks :-) -- Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
