On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Luigi Toscano <luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it> wrote: > Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: >> El dimecres, 13 de juliol de 2016, a les 1:27:21 CEST, Albert Astals Cid va >> escriure: >>> El divendres, 8 de juliol de 2016, a les 11:50:44 CEST, Andreas Sturmlechner >>> va escriure: >>>> On Friday, 8 July 2016 at 11:11, Luigi Toscano wrote: >>>>> On Friday 08 of July 2016 11:03:05 Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: >>>>>> None of them were ported yet, in fact they haven't seen commits in >>>>>> years. >>>>>> They should probably be converted to git, still, but imo no need to >>>>>> keep >>>>>> it releasing. >>>>> >>>>> Some of them could be probably dropped, but also isn't it possible that >>>>> they slipped out of the radar because not on git? Would it be possible >>>>> to >>>>> have them converted first and see if this changes? >>>> >>>> kommander and kfilereplace are not actually webdev related, so could be >>>> moved into other categories (kdeutils?) if not dropped. >>>> >>>> Not sure how many people still do image maps (so chances this will be >>>> picked up again are slim), and klinkstatus still depends on kdepimlibs-4 >>>> to build. >>> Let's move them to git first and then decide if we want to drop them or not. >>> >>> Given the freeze for KDE Applications 16.08 is like in 2 days i would not >>> rush for now, let's all make a note for 2.5 months and decide if we want to >>> release them for KDE Applications 16.12. >> >> So it's 2.5 months later now. >> >> I would like to get them moved to git if possible, get them released for KDE >> Applications 16.12 and tell people they need to start caring about them if >> they don't want to see them dropped for 17.04 >> >> Now the question is, how do we get them into git? > > I think that sysadmins have (or had) a system dedicated to SVN-to-git > conversion, and also the examples of the old conversions. There are some > instructions here: > https://techbase.kde.org/Projects/MoveToGit/UsingSvn2Git
We had such a system - all such machines have since been shutdown though. I think Nicolas has a container on one of our machines which he does the occasional conversion which gets requested in, but it has been a long time since that was last used if I recall correctly. > >> >> Or, am i being too naive and we should just drop them? > > Well, it would be good if this transfer is done and this knowledge is not lost > (you never know). > > -- > Luigi Cheers, Ben