> El 6 oct 2016, a las 19:44, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> escribió: > > El dimecres, 5 d’octubre de 2016, a les 22:06:22 CEST, Ben Cooksley va > escriure: >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Luigi Toscano <luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it> > wrote: >>> Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: >>>> El dimecres, 13 de juliol de 2016, a les 1:27:21 CEST, Albert Astals Cid >>>> va >>>> >>>> escriure: >>>>> El divendres, 8 de juliol de 2016, a les 11:50:44 CEST, Andreas >>>>> Sturmlechner>>> >>>>> va escriure: >>>>>>> On Friday, 8 July 2016 at 11:11, Luigi Toscano wrote: >>>>>>>> On Friday 08 of July 2016 11:03:05 Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: >>>>>>>> None of them were ported yet, in fact they haven't seen commits in >>>>>>>> years. >>>>>>>> They should probably be converted to git, still, but imo no need to >>>>>>>> keep >>>>>>>> it releasing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Some of them could be probably dropped, but also isn't it possible >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> they slipped out of the radar because not on git? Would it be possible >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> have them converted first and see if this changes? >>>>>> >>>>>> kommander and kfilereplace are not actually webdev related, so could be >>>>>> moved into other categories (kdeutils?) if not dropped. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not sure how many people still do image maps (so chances this will be >>>>>> picked up again are slim), and klinkstatus still depends on >>>>>> kdepimlibs-4 >>>>>> to build. >>>>> >>>>> Let's move them to git first and then decide if we want to drop them or >>>>> not. >>>>> >>>>> Given the freeze for KDE Applications 16.08 is like in 2 days i would >>>>> not >>>>> rush for now, let's all make a note for 2.5 months and decide if we want >>>>> to >>>>> release them for KDE Applications 16.12. >>>> >>>> So it's 2.5 months later now. >>>> >>>> I would like to get them moved to git if possible, get them released for >>>> KDE Applications 16.12 and tell people they need to start caring about >>>> them if they don't want to see them dropped for 17.04 >>>> >>>> Now the question is, how do we get them into git? >>> >>> I think that sysadmins have (or had) a system dedicated to SVN-to-git >>> conversion, and also the examples of the old conversions. There are some >>> instructions here: >>> https://techbase.kde.org/Projects/MoveToGit/UsingSvn2Git >> >> We had such a system - all such machines have since been shutdown though. >> I think Nicolas has a container on one of our machines which he does >> the occasional conversion which gets requested in, but it has been a >> long time since that was last used if I recall correctly.
I had one in fiesta, but I seem to recall you removed it to free space? I can recreate it though. > Any way i can get that 65G svn file somehow or we can't port anything else > from svn to git? It can be downloaded via anonymous rsync, IIRC it's rsync.kde.org::svnmirror. > Or Nicolás can I convince you to git-ify kdewebdev? Maybe tomorrow when I manage to wake up. It's adminbeers night today ;) -- Nicolás