El dimarts, 25 d’octubre de 2016, a les 23:40:12 CET, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > El dilluns, 17 d’octubre de 2016, a les 20:31:50 CEST, Nicolás Alvarez va > > escriure: > > 2016-10-06 19:44 GMT-03:00 Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org>: > > > El dimecres, 5 d’octubre de 2016, a les 22:06:22 CEST, Ben Cooksley va > > > > > > escriure: > > >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Luigi Toscano > > >> <luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it> > > > > > > wrote: > > >> > Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > > >> >> El dimecres, 13 de juliol de 2016, a les 1:27:21 CEST, Albert Astals > > >> >> Cid > > >> >> va > > >> >> > > >> >> escriure: > > >> >>> El divendres, 8 de juliol de 2016, a les 11:50:44 CEST, Andreas > > >> >>> Sturmlechner>>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> va escriure: > > >> >>>> On Friday, 8 July 2016 at 11:11, Luigi Toscano wrote: > > >> >>>>> On Friday 08 of July 2016 11:03:05 Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > > >> >>>>>> None of them were ported yet, in fact they haven't seen commits > > >> >>>>>> in > > >> >>>>>> years. > > >> >>>>>> They should probably be converted to git, still, but imo no need > > >> >>>>>> to > > >> >>>>>> keep > > >> >>>>>> it releasing. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> Some of them could be probably dropped, but also isn't it > > >> >>>>> possible > > >> >>>>> that > > >> >>>>> they slipped out of the radar because not on git? Would it be > > >> >>>>> possible > > >> >>>>> to > > >> >>>>> have them converted first and see if this changes? > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> kommander and kfilereplace are not actually webdev related, so > > >> >>>> could > > >> >>>> be > > >> >>>> moved into other categories (kdeutils?) if not dropped. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Not sure how many people still do image maps (so chances this will > > >> >>>> be > > >> >>>> picked up again are slim), and klinkstatus still depends on > > >> >>>> kdepimlibs-4 > > >> >>>> to build. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Let's move them to git first and then decide if we want to drop > > >> >>> them > > >> >>> or > > >> >>> not. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Given the freeze for KDE Applications 16.08 is like in 2 days i > > >> >>> would > > >> >>> not > > >> >>> rush for now, let's all make a note for 2.5 months and decide if we > > >> >>> want > > >> >>> to > > >> >>> release them for KDE Applications 16.12. > > >> >> > > >> >> So it's 2.5 months later now. > > >> >> > > >> >> I would like to get them moved to git if possible, get them released > > >> >> for > > >> >> KDE Applications 16.12 and tell people they need to start caring > > >> >> about > > >> >> them if they don't want to see them dropped for 17.04 > > >> >> > > >> >> Now the question is, how do we get them into git? > > >> > > > >> > I think that sysadmins have (or had) a system dedicated to SVN-to-git > > >> > conversion, and also the examples of the old conversions. There are > > >> > some > > >> > instructions here: > > >> > https://techbase.kde.org/Projects/MoveToGit/UsingSvn2Git > > >> > > >> We had such a system - all such machines have since been shutdown > > >> though. > > >> I think Nicolas has a container on one of our machines which he does > > >> the occasional conversion which gets requested in, but it has been a > > >> long time since that was last used if I recall correctly. > > > > > > Any way i can get that 65G svn file somehow or we can't port anything > > > else > > > from svn to git? > > > > > > Or Nicolás can I convince you to git-ify kdewebdev? > > > > It's done! Please review: > > kde:scratch/nalvarez/kdewebdev-kfilereplace > > kde:scratch/nalvarez/kdewebdev-kimagemapeditor > > kde:scratch/nalvarez/kdewebdev-klinkstatus > > kde:scratch/nalvarez/kdewebdev-kommander > > I don't think much changes happened but the branches from > https://websvn.kde.org/branches/Applications/ > are missing (i.e. you only have the KDE/XXX ones), would it be much work to > get them in?
Ping? > > Cheers, > Albert > > > The history seems to be complete, but I haven't tested if the latest > > master compiles etc. I think they rely on the global > > kdewebdev/CMakeLists.txt and don't build standalone. > > > > I also need to know where to push the final git repos. Should I create > > a kdewebdev module in repo-metadata? And what needs to be done with > > i18n for a svn->git move?