Is imposing additional requirements on organizations classed as religious a form of "viewpoint discrimination"?
If the judge goes around the bend, could we bring a RLUIPA claim on the ground that fiscal survival is essential to our mission?
Does anyone have some hard history about this law?
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.