RE: Dover Intelligent-Design Case

[Friedman, Howard M.]

Here is my blogging attempt to accurately report on the case. http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2005/12/dover-school-district-loses.html   I would appreciate anyone’s comments on inaccuracies or misinterpretations.   ************************************* Howard M. Friedman Disting. Univ. Professor Emeritus University of Toledo College of Law Toledo, OH 43606-3390 Phone: (419) 530-2911, FAX (419) 530-4732 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************* From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 12:48 PM To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu Subject: Re: Dover Intelligent-Design Case   In a message dated 12/20/2005 12:39:32 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jim,   As you well know, judges can form opinions after hearing the evidence.  And the 139 pages supports his conclusion in that even-tempered nature, free of bias, and with care-and-sensitivity- to-the -school-control-issues manner you are say you are concerned about.   Sorry you couldn't be bothered to inform yourself before forming an opinion about the judge.   Steve As I said, it will take a while to review the decision.  Honesty from the law professors already discussing this decision:  have you read the decision in FULL?    In fact, Ann popped a corker from the decision to the list.  Once I have read the decision in full, I will better know whether Ann did a disservice to the judge in her selection of snippet.  As it stands, the prose quoted by Ann leaves the impression of a certain bias on the part of the judge.    Jim Henderson Senior Counsel ACLJ

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.