Sincere apologies to Jim if I left the impression that he was engaging in character assassination. I was anticipating a more general reaction from conservative supporters of the teaching of ID in the science curriculum -- the sort of reaction that the judge himself anticipated when he predicted that opponents of his decision would try to label him a liberal activist.
H ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:19 am Subject: Re: Dover Intelligent-Design Case To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > > In a message dated 12/20/2005 12:51:52 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Before we begin to see the inevitable character assassination > here are some > facts about the judge: > > > > Frankly, I am perplexed. Surely you are not asserting that > observations > about deliberate language choices constitute character > assassination per se. > > Jim Henderson > Senior Counsel > _______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
