Re: The Roberts Court

[Hamilton02]

Not that I would not welcome it, but I would be surprised to see one of the RLUIPA land use cases come before the Court this Term unless the issue is the standard under "substantial burden."  There has been far more activity on that issue than the constitutional issues in the courts of appeals.   Marci       Marci A. Hamilton Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law Yeshiva University     In a message dated 7/25/2006 9:58:40 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I would add that an early Establishment Clause challenge to RLUIPA's land use provisions seems likely, as does  renewed litigation about charitable choice-i.e., the Iowa prison litigation. Perhaps too the Court will look at the growing split about the ministerial exception to Title VII. Marc Stern

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.