Eric, Glad to see you focusing on the claims made with respect to Measure 3. I've been counseling a nontheistic North Dakota group for over a year on Measure 3 and its predecessor. My primary concern has been the potential use of Measure 3 to legalize discrimination against atheists, members of minority religions and LGBT. Considering the fact that Justice Scalia doesn't believe the Establishment Clause protects atheists, Justice Thomas doesn't believe in incorporation and six of nine justices self-identify themselves as Catholic, all bets are off what would have benn protected by mere burden in Measure 3.
Bob Ritter Jefferson Madison Center for Religious Liberty A Project of the Law Office of Robert V. Ritter Falls Church, VA 703-533-0236 On June 14, 2012 at 4:42 PM Eric Rassbach <erassb...@becketfund.org> wrote: > > These appear to be some of the main arguments against passing the RFRA: > > http://ndagainst3.com/get-the-facts/ > > As an example, this TV ad said that the RFRA would allow men to marry girls > aged 12 and to beat their spouses: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ngnqGR6e8 > > There was also quite a bit of blog chatter about sharia law being enforced in > North Dakota as a result of passing the RFRA. > > I did not see anything about Native Americans. > > >
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
