I'm curious about something in your letter.  Toward the end, you say,
"Article 3, section 18 of the Constitution of Mississippi already protects
as sacred 'the free enjoyment of all religious sentiments and the different
modes of worship.'  Senate Bill 2681 is unnecessary to protect freedom of
belief and worship in Mississippi, and potentially quite harmful."

 

It appears that you are suggesting that religiious liberty simply requires
that a person be allowed to believe what they do and to worship however they
do.  That seems like a very very narrow characterization of religious
liberty.  The 1st Amendment specifically talks about free exercise, not
merely freedom of belief and worship.  What would you say that free exercise
refers to when it says it is to be protected?

 

Brad Pardee

 

From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Ira Lupu
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 11:21 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: letter opposing Mississippi RFRA

 

A group of ten legal academics, including myself and a number of others who
post on this list, have prepared a letter urging the legislative defeat of a
proposed Religious Freedom Restoration Act in Mississippi.  The letter has
recently been delivered and made publicly available.  It can be found here:
http://www.thirdway.org/publications/795


 

-- 

Ira C. Lupu
F. Elwood & Eleanor Davis Professor of Law, Emeritus
George Washington University Law School
2000 H St., NW 
Washington, DC 20052
(202)994-7053

Co-author (with Professor Robert Tuttle) of "Secular Government, Religious
People" (forthcoming, summer 2014, Wm. B. Eerdmans Pub. Co.)
My SSRN papers are here:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=181272#reg

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to