I have great admiration for the Becket Fund and its attorneys, notwithstanding our substantive differences. But the Fund is not doing itself any favors by promulgating absurd statements such as:
“Just last week the Supreme Court ordered HHS not to enforce the exact rules they finalized today." and "the government still won’t give up on its quest to force nuns and other religious employers to distribute contraceptives." On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Scarberry, Mark < mark.scarbe...@pepperdine.edu> wrote: > Here are the final regs: > > > https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2015-17076.pdf > (via > https://www.yahoo.com/health/breaking-birth-control-coverage-guaranteed-for-123731031997.html > ). > > The Becket Fund criticizes them here: > http://www.becketfund.org/new-hhs-mandate-rules-defiance-supreme-court/. > > Cross-posted to conlawprof list. > > Mark > > Mark S. Scarberry > Pepperdine University School of Law > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or > wrongly) forward the messages to others. >
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
