In Branch Ministries, “the Church d[id] not maintain that a withdrawal from 
electoral politics would violate its beliefs.” 211 F.3d at 142.  This fact 
played a role in the court’s “no substantial burden” reasoning.  If a Church 
did so  maintain today, Marty, what extra analysis would you endorse that leads 
to your conclusion that “the Johnson Amendment does not substantially burden 
the religious activity of a religious organization—and therefore does not raise 
any serious Free Exercise or RFRA questions—even if the organization believes 
that partisan politicking is a significant component of its religious mission” 
(emphasis added)?

-David

David B. Cruz
Professor of Law
University of Southern California Gould School of Law
Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071
U.S.A.


From: <religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu> on behalf of Marty Lederman 
<martin.leder...@law.georgetown.edu>
Reply-To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
Date: Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 5:55 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
Subject: Johnson Amendment E.O.

FYI:

https://takecareblog.com/blog/what-s-all-this-fuss-about-the-johnson-amendment<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https://takecareblog.com/blog/what-s-all-this-fuss-about-the-johnson-amendment&c=E,1,_-sdTULXZVit5esk1q9CjqIQ45Hv-72LSCkoXZJo7hv5uv1DHfbFMEm6GIi2LKzeCRtpTbEAgpKulNuz3qbbj-ZFFa7_lpo_LXO7k_TYT1o8J00,&typo=1>

Please let me know if you notice any mistakes, thanks.

--
Marty Lederman
Georgetown University Law Center
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
202-662-9937

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to