(This) one would hope.
David B. Cruz Professor of Law University of Southern California Gould School of Law Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071 U.S.A. From: <religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu> on behalf of Marty Lederman <martin.leder...@law.georgetown.edu> Reply-To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu> Date: Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 8:08 AM To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu> Subject: Re: Johnson Amendment E.O. Well, if Hobby Lobby's dictum that RFRA radically altered the pre-Smith law were correct, that'd be one thing. But it's not<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/Lederman_PDF_pt9q3ynr.pdf&c=E,1,iMd0PJIp536dQdUOyub6icCVtL1zxFP2DLkvQKF9fQyXhg-_0AOMU0BI5Df7ETM0SiuV-5gYFV_ktiI_0FKbkUnZpaY0BukzrlHsUJAkA-qZV82VdRgk&typo=1>. And therefore doesn't the unanimous "no burden" holding in Jimmy Swaggart, cited by the court in Rossetti, pretty much settle the question?
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
