I have to interject here... Gregg R. Lengling wrote:
Your statement Gregg that "the' transmitter will not reproduce that low of a tone without distortion" is generalizing that all repeater transmitters are incapable of response below 60 Hz. I have tested many repeater transmitters and can verify that 'most' station exciters that employ FM modulation will easily do 33 Hz at standard PL deviation levels. These include the PLL Mastr II, FM Micor, Mitrek, MSR-2000, Hamtronics synthesized PLL, and certainly many more modern repeaters that are synthesized.
?? Explain your use of the term overdriving in your statement.
Huh? Receivers that can do DPL can easily detect a 33 Hz PL tone, and I don't know of any receiver I have ever tested that wouldn't receive a DPL properly from the discriminator. a 33 cycle PL tone at 750 Hz transmitted deviation isn't a problem for the receiver to recover.
Agreed....
Since the modulation of a PL tone is a sine wave, what benefit would be realized by utilizing a NRZ (non-return-to-zero) type modulator? Kevin Custer
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] tone trivia..? Kevin Custer
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] tone trivia..? mch
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] tone trivia..? Jim B.
- [Repeater-Builder] MICOR LOW AUDIO David
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] MICOR LOW AUDIO Gerald Pelnar
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] MICOR LOW AUDIO Neil McKie
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] MICOR LOW AUDIO David
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] MICOR LOW AUDI... Neil McKie
- RE: [Repeater-Builder] MICOR LOW ... Mike Mullarkey
- Re: [Repeater-Builder] MICOR ... Neil McKie