This has to be OT for this group but the proper conversion would be:

KiloCycles per Second = KiloHertz.

Unfortunately I'm old enough to remember "time before KiloHertz" . . . . or 
maybe its fortunate I've lived to be that old.

        Joe K5FOG

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 5/21/2005 at 9:32 PM DCFluX wrote:

>I've got a kiloCycle to kiloHertz conversion table you can study.
>
>On 5/21/05, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> KiloHertz is the correct term!
>> 
>> Richard, N7TGB
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of DCFluX
>> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 7:17 PM
>> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: RE : Re: [Repeater-Builder] Poor Repeater RX
>> 
>> 
>> Don't you mean, kiloCycles?
>> 
>> On 5/21/05, Kevin K. Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > >------- Original Message -------
>> > >From : Eric Lemmon[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >Sent : 5/21/2005 4:05:15 PM
>> > >To : Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>> > >Cc :
>> > >Subject : RE : Re: [Repeater-Builder] Poor Repeater RX
>> > >
>> >  >Alexander,
>> > >
>> > >The
>> > >Sinclair Q-202G duplexer can barely make 85 dB when tuned on a network
>> > >analyzer, so that's the major part of your desense problem. It's only
>a
>> > >four-cavity duplexer, specified at 80 dB minimum isolation, so no
>amount
>> > >of tuning is going to make it operate at an isolation above its design
>> > >limit.
>> >
>> >  While I don't disagree with what has been written, please realize that
>> > *most* commercial manufacturers 'rate' their highband/2M duplexer at
>500
>> > kiloHertz split, not 600 kiloHertz where most amateur 2 meter repeaters
>> are
>> > operated.  This added frequency separation allows for the duplexer to
>> > provide more than the stated isolation at the 500 kiloHertz
>specification.
>> >
>> >  The Wacom WP-641 is specified at 85 dB of isolation at a 500 kiloHertz
>> > split, but provides 93 dB of isolation at 600 kiloHertz.  The Sinclair
>> Q202G
>> > is similar in its factory specifications, and isolation provided.
>> >
>> >  Kevin Custer
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >  ________________________________
>> >  Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> > To visit your group on the web, go to:
>> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>
>
>
>
> 
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to