--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "skipp025" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "I lifted the below text from the yahoo rfamplifiers group page, posted this last week by my friend Dave. It's right on the money. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rfamplifiers/ [paste] If you are able to measure the SWR of a coax connection at VHF, then you've installed a connector wrong. I used an HP 8510C network analyzer to measure a whole bunch of UHF to N, UHF to BNC and so forth, adapters, all stacked on top of each other to a foot long, and the lowest frequency where I measured anything of concern was at 2 GIGAhertz, where the SWR rose to 1.1:1. Yes, I know, amateur radio lore is full of the claim that UHF connectors are awful. They are, but only if you compare then to BNC and N, which are suitable for 10GHz and above. Assembled correctly, a UHF connector is invisible below 1GHz. [end] ________________________________________________________________________
I hope nobody is buying into this BS. Connector and adapter mis-match and loss issues are hardly "amateur radio lore" RF manufacturers and instrumentation companies have stressed this for years - justifiably. It's easy to verify if you have access to instrumentation. Just out of curiosity I decided to run a couple of tests. When you measure a device for SWR you are actually measuring return loss. You can do this on a network analyzer or with a spectrum analyzer and tracking generator plus a signal separation device such as a return loss bridge or directional coupler. I decided to try both instruments and compare the results. You first calibrate the measurement setup with precision components from your cal kit [e.g. Agilent 85032B]. The critical component is a precision 50 ohm load. With a good bridge or coupler you should be able to measure a return loss of 40 dB or greater [equivalent to an SWR or 1.02:1] Normally your instrument test ports will be type N although some instruments have APC-7 test ports. Your cal kit should match the test ports. I started with a full 2-port cal of the VNA and a normalization of the Spectrum analyzer. My reference load did measure as expected. The next step is to "insert" the device under test. In this case we are interested in looking at a UHF connector. Obviously, since the instrument is type N, we have to use adapters. Just out of curiosity, I decided to compare two pairs of adapters. First an NF-NF mated to an NM-NM. [UG-57B/U and UG-29B/U] This created an "insertable" device. These are "standard" adapters as opposed to "precision" components and as expected, there was some degradation of the return loss measurement. I then compared this to two other adapters, NM to UHF-F and UHF-M to NF [UG-146/U and UG-83/U], again creating an "insertable device" This pair has just a single UHF male to female junction and results in a significant decrease in return loss [i.e. increase in SWR.] I also tried inserting an 90 degree UHF adapter [UG-646/U] in line between the UG146/U and the UG83/U which resulted in further [significant] return loss degradation. I measured several sets of these parts and the results were not only consistent from part to part but generally match within a few tenths of a dB between the VNA and the spectrum analyzer. I always like to see comparable results from two significantly different instrument setups - it confirms your thought process and results. Results at: 150 MHz, 450 MHz, 900 MHz NM-NF adapters: [VNA]: 36 dB, 35 dB, 31 dB [SA/TG] 37 dB, 35.7 dB, 30 dB N-UHF + UHF-N adapters: [VNA]: 26 dB, 16.5 dB, 11.4 dB [SA/TG]: 23.6 dB, 17.2 dB, 11.5 dB N-UHF + UHF 90 + UHF-N [VNA]: 20.2 dB, 12.03 dB, 9.3 dB [SA/TG]: 21.6 DB, 11.9 dB, 9.1 dB Now just for reference, a return loss of 11 dB would be equivalent to an SWR of 1.785 : 1 [ONE UHF junction @ 900 MHz] and a return loss of 17 dB would be an SWR of 1.329 : 1 [@ 450 MHz] UHF connectors "invisible" below a gigahertz??? Hardly. Also - someone asked about the 90 degree N fitting at 900 MHz so I tested a few of those. That's easy because being M on one side and F on the other, it is inherently "insertable" The round kind [UG-27A/U] averaged return loss of 22 dB. The square ones[UG-27D/U] are better at 27 dB [1.094 : 1 SWR] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/