There should be a difference in the dielectric quality. In audio any old dielectric will be fine as the upper frequency to be passed is 20 KHz or so. For RF you need a better dielectric to cut down on attenuation.
73 Glenn WB4UIV At 07:55 AM 05/28/06, you wrote: >OK, so how is an RF RCA connector different from a >regular RCA connector? > >I do know I've seen them with shorter-than-normal >center pins; I have one short cable with an SO-239 on >one end and a short RCA plug on the other that came >out of either an old tube GE or Motorola radio. The >old Sensicon receivers had an RCA jack for the RF >input, and as I recall there was something at the >bottom that prevented a full-length RCA plug from >fully seating itself. > >If that's the only difference, maybe you could just >grind the center terminal down after soldering it. > >Bob M. >====== >--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > My stock of RF RCA connectors (the ones used for > > carrying RF inside GE > > MVPs, Mastr IIs etc.) has run dry, & I haven't seen > > any at our local swap > > meets. Anyone know where I can find these? Thanks. > > > > Bob NO6B > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
