Cort,
I need to understand if I have all the information correct from your
post.
One 440 machine. One duplexer. Two antennas connected to two feedlines
which can either be terminated to the duplexer as you so desire?
Only one
feedline to one antenna, not coupled or combined in any way? One
hardline /
antenna works good (DB420) and one hardline / antenna (Telewave
ANT450F10)
works bad?
The first step is to verify the Telewave wattmeter. I'd get a hold
of a
Bird 43 or equivalent and verify your readings. That's the easiest
thing to
do.
If your forward / reverse numbers are accurate then I'd suspect the
Telewave
system or it's hardline, unless proven otherwise. You need to rule out
either the antenna or the hardline by substitution, and one at a time.
Possible issues could be bad connectors either at the antenna base or
duplexer termination.
How long ago was the antenna system put up? Was there some heavy
rain in
the area that water could have been introduced into the connector /
hardline
if they weren't properly water-proofed?
Unless someone contradicts me here, I'm having a hard time believing
that
the vertical alignment of the Telewave is critical. In re-reading
your post
over a couple of times I'm wondering when you checked the alignment
and then
implemented a little down-tilt you may have done something wrong to
cause
the hardline / antenna system to react that way.
Keep us posted and good luck with finding out the problem.
Don, KD9PT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cort Buffington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 8:16 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Repeater Antenna Discussion
> Folks,
>
> My repeater partner and I have recently placed our new 440
machine. We
> have realized some odd issues. We bought a new Telewave ANT450F10 to
> put on top of the 100' tower, fed with a new piece of Andrew 5/8"
> heliax. We also side-mounted an old DB420 with the top a few feet
down
> from the top of the tower with about 85' of old 7/8" Andrew heliax.
> So, we put smokin' new gear on top, and smokin old below it. The
DB420
> is spaced correctly from the tower and is set up with each half 90
> degrees rotated.
>
> The tower is on relatively high pasture land (for NE Kansas anyway)
> with a nice clear view all around. I'll not say we're on a hill, but
> on relatively high ground. We are attempting to cover two towns
> approximately 25 miles apart. We are 1/3 of the way from town 1 to
> town 2 and about 3 miles N of the highway that pretty much is a
> straight shot connecting them.
>
> The Telewave setup on top performs poorly. The DB420 on the side is
> working great. By this difference, I mean signals that are getting
in
> full quieting on the DB420 are very noisy on the Telewave. Transmit
> differences mirror receive. S9 reception on the DB420, switch to the
> Telewave and it's S1-S3. We experience this phenomenon in all
> directions.
>
> Wattmeter (yes, it is a "real one" -- Telewave 44) says that things
> look good as far as loading both antennas -- DB420 is 1.43:1, F10 is
> 1.39:1. We are about to climb and take readings at the top to make
> sure there is no feed problem with the Telewave 'F10, and I admit
that
> has not been done yet. We did have a discussion with Telewave, who
> advised that vertical alignment of the F10 (as they refer to it) is
> critical. We have checked alignment and even implemented a little
down-
> tilt in the most important direction (just a few degrees). We see
not
> real appreciable difference.
>
> For you repeater elmers out there: If we don't find a problem with
the
> feedline on the Telewave antenna, does this make any sense? Telewave
> also HIGHLY recommended that the F10 isn't a good fit for this
> installation due to its extremely narrow vertical beamwidth, and
> recommended that a 4-bay dipole of theirs would be MUCH better
because
> of the ability to tune the pattern to our desired coverage area and
> the increased vertical beamwidth. I always thought I wanted NARROW
> vertical beamwidth to keep the RF on the horizon. I would have
thought
> that 100' up on relatively high ground (this is Kansas, after all)
> wouldn't have a real problem shooting over the top 10 - 30 miles
away.
>
> In any event I seek advice and wisdom, and yes, we are planning to
> check the coax for loss at the earliest convenience. I would like to
> take advantage of the top slot on the tower for improved performance
> rather than stay on the lower spot, and will try another antenna if
> necessary. I'm just having a hard time imagining that the F10 has
> appreciably narrower vertical beam as a 9.something dBd antenna than
> the F10 as a 10dBd antenna, etc. etc. And it also seems counter
> intuitive that a taller vertical beamwidth and less gain on the
> horizon in this application would be better. I trust the experience
> and knowledge of Telewave, but I also trust the wisdom from this
list,
> which has saved me many times.
>
> Your thoughts gentlemen?
>
> --
> Cort Buffington
> H: +1-785-838-3034
> M: +1-785-865-7206
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
