I, for one,  support  Nate  and  his request 110% and I am glad I 
heard about   this  in  time to do what little I  can.
Tom DGN


--- In [email protected], Rick Beatty <nu7...@...> wrote:
>
> Where is our moderatoer -- can't we stop this thread -- ??? How did
he get
> here anyway ???
> 
> Rick
> 
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Thomas Oliver <tsoli...@...> wrote:
> 
> >   We do not live in a free country anymore do we?
> >
> > tom
> >
> > > [Original Message]
> > > From: Nate Duehr <n...@... <nate%40natetech.com>>
> > > To:
<[email protected]<Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
> > >
> > > Cc: <st...@... <steve%40airspeedonline.com>>
> > > Date: 2/27/2009 1:06:07 AM
> > > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: [OT] Urgent request - probably
off-topic
> > but please read...
> > >
> > > Folks, I am not a spammer by trade or by choice in normal
> > > circumstances, but I BEG of you to please read this.
> > >
> > > If you are even a SMALL enthusiast of Aviation, Aerospace or
anything
> > > related to breaking the surly bonds of earth and reaching skyward,
> > > PLEASE take a moment, I beg of you.
> > >
> > > To my friends and members of:
> > >
> > > Boulder, CO Linux Users Group
> > > Colorado Linux Users and Enthusiasts
> > > Rocky Mountain VHF+ Amateur Radio Group
> > > Colorado D-STAR Association
> > > Grand Mesa Contesters of Colorado
> > > Amateur Radio Satellite Corporation and Mailing List
> > > Repeater-Builder Mailing List
> > > MIT PIC Microcontroller Mailing List
> > > Yaesu FT-857 Mailing List
> > > VHF Contesting Remailer Mailing List
> > > The Internet Radio Radio Linking Project
> > > The D-STAR Digital List
> > >
> > > And other friends and acquaintances who will receive this message
> > > privately... and anyone you care to forward it to...
> > >
> > > Tonight on my way home I fired up my iPod to listen to a podcast by
> > > well-known and very well-spoken Steven "Force" Tupper, an aviation
> > > enthusiast from Michigan. What I heard chilled my heart to the bone.
> > >
> > > The TSA under the auspices of "Homeland Security" has floated a
> > > proposal to restrict and in my opinion, DESTROY numerous legendary
> > > aircraft, by limiting their use so heavily that you will never see
> > > them in the skies over America again. While this may sound
> > > "alarmist", please trust me, it's not.
> > >
> > > You all know me, and know that I can write well, expressing my
> > > concerns with politics, living, and even the banal things of life in
> > > words, fairly well -- but I can not possibly top the writing of Mr.
> > > Tupper.
> > >
> > > Even more eloquent is his VOICE in his podcast, where he perfectly
> > > expresses the frustration, and sheer TERROR that the TSA itself has
> > > brought down on the United State's Aviation community with the
> > > proposal they've recently released, inappropriately entitled, the
> > > "Large Aircraft Security Program", or LASP.
> > >
> > > For the best and most intelligent commentary I've heard on the topic
> > > to date -- PLEASE ... LISTEN to his podcast at:
> > >
> > > <http://media.libsyn.com/media/airspeed/AirspeedLASP.mp3>
> > >
> > > You really must just hear... his voice. I do hope his server can
> > > handle an onslaught -- if it can't, wait, and listen later.
> > >
> > > (I fully intend to help him with the costs associated with
> > > distributing his podcast if he needs it this month, it's just that
> > > important. Steve, please let me know if you need assistance. I have
> > > worked in data centers and web-based businesses, and I
understand that
> > > publishing these things online to large numbers of people, is
NOT free.)
> > >
> > > It's just over 30 minutes in length, and he NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT
-- even
> > > if you are NOT a pilot. He gives instructions in the podcast.
> > >
> > > If you honestly do NOT have time to listen, at least READ and
RESPOND
> > > to his letter in response to the TSA's Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking.
> > > He needs your input by TOMORROW. The entire text of his podcast is
> > > also available at the link below, if you read faster than you listen
> > > -- so to speak.
> > >
> > >
> > <
> >
http://airspeedonline.blogspot.com/2009/02/large-aircraft-security-program-
> > capt.html
> > > >
> > >
> > > If this non-legislative rule change comes to pass, you and your
family
> > > may never SEE many historical aircraft or have an opportunity to
> > > purchase a RIDE in any classic "warbird" aircraft in the skies over
> > > America ever again. The rule is BROAD and affects modern aircraft
> > > also, but the aircraft we will miss the most, are the ones of our
> > > history that tell our story as a country.
> > >
> > > To NOT take action and RESPOND means that you've let a small
group of
> > > tireless aviation historians, restoration specialists, mechanics,
> > > pilots, and everyone who's ever watched an airshow with aircraft
from
> > > the classic Warbird fleet down. WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT.
> > >
> > > PLEASE read or listen. Mr. Tupper explains it far better than I
> > > possibly can. The TSA's proposal adds NO security to our nation
> > > whatsoever. It's simply government run amok.
> > >
> > > Here's a list from Mr. Tupper's website, of aircraft that I
personally
> > > believe you will RARELY see in the skies of America again, if the
> > > TSA's "LASP" passes into being without even so much as a single
> > > legislator overseeing it, and little to no due-process available to
> > > anyone who violates it.
> > >
> > > Aircraft and Max Takeoff Weight (Varies within Type)
> > > Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress - 65,500
> > > Chance Vought F4U Corsair - 14,449
> > > Consolidated B-24 Liberator - 65,000
> > > Curtiss C-46 Commando - 48,000
> > > Curtiss SB2C Helldiver - 16,800
> > > Douglas A-26 Invader - 35,000
> > > Douglas DC-3/C-47 Skytrain/Dakota - 31,000
> > > Douglas B-23 Dragon - 32,400
> > > Fairchild C-119 Flying Boxcar - 64,000
> > > Fairchild C-82 Packet - 54,000
> > > Ford Tri-Motor - 13,500
> > > Grumman AF-2S Guardian - 25,500
> > > Grumman Avenger - 17,893
> > > Grumman F6F Hellcat - 15,415
> > > Grumman F8F Bearcat - 12,947
> > > Grumman HU-16 Albatross - 33,000
> > > Grumman G-73 Mallard - 12,750
> > > Junkers Ju 52 - 24,200
> > > Lockheed C-60 Hudson - 18,500
> > > Lockheed L-18 Lodestar - 17,500
> > > Lockheed PV-2 Harpoon - 31,077
> > > Lockheed T-33 - 15,100
> > > North American B-25 Mitchell - 41,800
> > > North American P-82 Twin Mustang - 25,591
> > > PBY-6A Catalina - 64,450
> > > Republic P-47 Thunderbolt - 17,500
> > >
> > > You may not be a pilot, you may not even care about ANY aircraft --
> > > but if you care about the pilots who fly them, the mechanics who
> > > wrench on them, the crowds at hundreds of airshows across the
country
> > > who see them, and the thousands of thousands who lived their lives
> > > building an American legacy in Aviation -- one of our best legacies
> > > ever -- please follow Mr. Tupper's request, and add your name to the
> > > list of people who AGREE with him in his response to the NPRM
sent out
> > > by the TSA.
> > >
> > > I, like you, am a busy person -- I had other things to do tonight. I
> > > would much have preferred an enjoyable evening pursuing other
things.
> > > Hell, I would rather have just forwarded you all a few jokes or
stayed
> > > "on-topic" on our favorite mailing lists, but I can not sit by idle
> > > and watch this come to pass.
> > >
> > > Mr. Tupper needs your support no later than mid-day tomorrow, please
> > > listen, read and RESPOND.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your time, and I apologize if this is FAR
off-topic for
> > > some of the mailing lists you all know me from. Some lists, it's
more
> > > on-topic than others. This is so aggregious, so saddening, so
> > > frustrating, that I just HAD to share. Like Mr. Tupper -- I'm trying
> > > hard to keep this message "PG Rated". VERY hard.
> > >
> > > I just can't think of any more caring, thoughtful people in all
of the
> > > other hobbies and passions of my life to share this critical
> > > information with, and to BEG for your support of Mr. Tupper's letter
> > > in response to the TSA. Mr. Tupper also points out that the rule
> > > isn't far from encompassing other iconic aircraft, and says that if
> > > the TSA enacts this rule and LOWERS the weight limitations low
enough
> > > to encompass such iconic aircraft as the North American P-51
> > > "Mustang", then... as he so eloquently puts it:
> > >
> > > "Be very careful. You might get away with decimating other grand
dames
> > > of the skies, but every redneck, suit, line worker, banker,
> > > lumberjack, lawyer, cop, fireman, landscaper, fast-food cashier, and
> > > child able to stand recognizes the mighty P-51 Mustang. Not that
> > > aviation would fail to miss the other aircraft that the TSA would so
> > > cavalierly tear from the sky, but at least we have the P-51 Mustang
> > > still guarding the 12,100-pound boundary."
> > >
> > > Thank you deeply from the bottom of my heart if you take the time to
> > > listen or read, and especially if you will send your full name as a
> > > U.S. Citizen to Mr. Tupper with your comments.
> > >
> > > Aviation is one of my deepest passions, and I can't imagine that
even
> > > the most disinterested person in Aviation would let these great
ships
> > > of our past be virtually banned from our skies in a single powerful
> > > and misguided attempt at "security" over liberty, in this great
country.
> > >
> > > Enjoy the rest of your evening in peace, please help, and thank you
> > > again.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Nathan Duehr, n...@... <nate%40natetech.com>
> > >
> > > Private Pilot, Single-Engine Land (since 1991)
> > > Aircraft Owners and Pilot's Association Member (since 1992)
> > > Amateur Radio Extra-Class Operator (WY0X - since 1991)
> > > Current President, Colorado Repeater Association
> > > Former Secretary, Colorado Council of Amateur Radio Clubs
> > > Former Member, USAF Auxiliary - Civil Air Patrol
> > > Linux, Electronics, and RF enthusiast ...
> > > ... Or however else you know me.
> > > --
> > > Nate Duehr
> > > n...@... <nate%40natetech.com>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >  
> >
>


Reply via email to