At 8/12/2009 08:54, you wrote: > >> n...@... wrote: > >> Yes, but increasing the user's deviation to the proper > >> level would help a lot more. > >A lot of people have voices, which are not considered "Radio" >or "Broadcast Quality" in both pitch and volume. Add a little >mic shyness and you're often stuck with lower average deviation.
Still, no reason they can't close-talk the mic with whatever voice they have. >Trying to inform and fix users about close talking the mic >at higher volume levels does a good job of scaring some folks >off. I guess this is where philosophical issues come to play. I don't care if I lose users that are incapable of properly modulating their radios. > >> A simple VOX ANDed with the COS would take care of that. > >> > >> Bob NO6B > >I would be interested in a description of the above... Any ol' audio detector/filter/comparitor would do. Nothing fancy like the "SmartVox" we use for Shuttle audio (which doesn't work on amplitude, but rather changes in audio frequency), just something that says "I saw peaks over 4 kHz" or "average deviation over the past 5 seconds was at least 1.5 kHz". Bob NO6B
