The one thought on LibreJS improvement I was imagining so far:
Some sort of crowdsourced list of recognized free JS, like the way that
adblocking lists are put together to block ads. I imagine a whitelist
that just knows that Codeberg's JS is free, so it is whitelisted not by
individual local users of LibreJS but by a collected list everyone gets
by default.
On 2024-01-05 4:08, Yuchen Pei wrote:
On Thu 2024-01-04 13:49:00 -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote:
Note that there's also this issue at Gitea:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/13393
Anyway, I think it is not okay to downgrade Codeberg for not
functioning with LibreJS when it is 100% free software anyway.
Insisting on this particular tooling needs to not be such a strong
requirement.
I think LibreJS needs some improved options for operating and should
not be a blocker to Codeberg getting a higher grade.
In practice, if sites that are 100% free software are not being
recognized by LibreJS, and the way modern sites are put together makes
doing this non-trivial, then the problem is LibreJS's approach, not
the site.
Suggestions on how to improve librejs to make site administrators life
easier to comply are welcome :)
[... 33 lines elided]
Best,
Yuchen
--
Dr Yuchen Pei |https://ypei.org | Timezone: UTC+11
PGP Key: 47F9 D050 1E11 8879 9040 4941 2126 7E93 EF86 DFD0
https://ypei.org/assets/ypei-pubkey.txt
