On 2024-01-11 7:53, Richard Stallman wrote:
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> My vote is to move the LibreJS criteria to higher grades,
It's not a matter of voting, but that could be a good idea.
"Satisfies LibreJS" could go in level B, leaving "is free" in level C.
Yes, I meant voting as a metaphor, just a way of saying "my
opinion/suggestion/preference".
What is the process to go ahead with this change? Splitting free JS
between "is free" (verified at the time of review) for level C and
satisfies-LibreJS for level B
> Is there a chance that the simple fix to the licenses URL link will
> address issues with LibreJS?
Try it and see!
Codeberg has now fixed the link and fixed the new-repo link to go to
Codeberg docs instead of the choosealicense website. Unfortunately,
these fixes did not resolve the LibreJS flagging.