On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:46:45 -0400 Richard wrote: > I don't see a need to > give a site a bad mark for referring to Google Analytics or anything > else that doesn't stop the site from functioning with LibreJS.
this is a different concern - for a site to fail the proposed A+0, it would implicitly "stop the site from functioning with LibreJS" - in the case of gitlab.com, it would stop the site from functioning for anyone, any computer, any web browser, whether or not the website used any scripts - the proposal is the privacy analog to C0: C0: > All important site functionality that's enabled for use with that package > works correctly (though it need not look as nice) in free browsers, including > IceCat, without running any nonfree software sent by the site. (C0) i will re-state the proposed A+0 more precisely: A+0: > All important site functionality per criteria (C0) works correctly, > without contacting any third-party service(s) delegated by the site. (A+0) the criteria is not related to scripts - it is a privacy concern, on par with the "no logging" criteria - in fact, the "no logging" criteria (A+1) is meaningless without this proposed criteria; because in practice, every request to the website cascades hundreds of requests to third-parties who are not subject to any of these criteria