this patch depends on the previous patch
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2024-04/msg00029.html
based on 'proposed-new-repo-criteria.html'
https://www.gnu.org/software/proposed-new-repo-criteria.html, which expands
criteria A-plus-1


--- ./www/software/repo-criteria.html   2024-04-24 19:57:15.574589402 -0400
+++ ./www/software/repo-criteria.html   2024-04-24 20:05:23.967901736 -0400
@@ -126,6 +126,9 @@
 
     <li id="B3"><p>Does not recommend nonfree licenses for works of
         practical use.  <strong>(B3)</strong></p></li>
+    <li id="B4"><p>
+        Allows viewing and downloading of source code without authenticating.
+        <strong>(B4)</strong></p></li>
   </ul>
 
 <h4 id="A">A &mdash; Excellent</h4>
@@ -174,13 +174,16 @@
 <p>The above criteria, plus:</p>
 
 <ul>
-  <li id="A-plus-0"><p>Allows visitors to look and download without 
authenticating.
+  <li id="A-plus-0"><p>
+      All important site functionality works (ie: all 'C' criteria are 
satisfied),
+      without contacting any third-party service(s) delegated by the site.
       <strong>(A+0)</strong></p></li>
 
   <li id="A-plus-1"><p>Does not log anything about visitors. Note that
       this criterion is based solely on the good faith of the forge's
       administrator. There is no way to be certain that the forge refrains
-      from logging connections.
+      from logging connections; and there is no way to apply this criteria
+      to any third-parties if A+0 is not also satisfied.
       <strong>(A+1)</strong></p></li>
 
   <li id="A-plus-2"><p>Follows the criteria in The Electronic Frontier

Reply via email to