> > 1. In the above example of GitHub getting grade F for important > > site functionality requiring nonfree JavaScript, for example, > > we could perhaps link to an email list discussion where we refer > > to a particular instance of important functionality breaking > > when we don't run a particular nonfree JavaScript. > > I think this is not a wise idea. > > * It would be a lot more work, and we have more important things we > should attend to. > > * Pointing at those discussions would focus attention on the > disagreements in the discussions. That could be counter productive. > > I suggest asking your associate to give suggestions of what sorts > of answers perse would want to see. That way we could look at > this question more clearly.
I think he was hoping for a list of some non-free JavaScript files so that he (were he running the code-hosting website) could look through each and fix them. We cannot be expected to provide a complete list, but I imagine it is useful to list any that we discovered in the course of the evaluation.
