Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Martin Aspeli wrote: >> If you want to pull in, say, plone.supermodel (a "pure Zope 3" package >> that should be re-usable and may be useful to BFG if it ever wants to >> serialise Zope 3 schema interfaces to/from an XML representation) well, >> it uses zope:* ZCML directives. Are you going to fork plone.supermodel? > > I would be very tempted at least. Or decide to not use supermodel.
Which would mean that the BFG-intersecting parts of the repoze stack would be a fork or re-implementation of all Zope stuff that was interesting to it. I don't think that's a sustainable way forward. Or at least, then repoze should stop billing itself as "the maturity of Zope now with the flexibility of the WSGI future". But I don't think that's what Paul or Chris would want. :) Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
