Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Martin Aspeli wrote: >> Chris McDonough wrote: >> >>> That package is now done... >>> >>> http://static.repoze.org/zcmldocs >>> >>> and >>> >>> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/repoze.zcml/0.1 >>> >>> I've adjusted the trunk of bfg and the trunk of chameleon.zpt to use ZCML >>> declaration implementations from this rather than using the "stock" >>> implementations from zope.component. >> Given that Plone also uses chameleon.zpt (via five.pt) this means that, >> if I understand correctly, Plone now gains this dependency, and part of >> the Plone stack uses what will seem to most people like an arbitrary, >> almost-identical-but-not-quite way of configuring components that's >> different to what the rest of the stack uses. > > I'm not sure that is true: people can still use the standard zope zcml > directorives instead of the repoze.zcml alternatives and everything will > work normally. > > The only downside is that chameleon.zpt will pull in a few extra > packages, but you yourself have argued that that should not bother > people.
+1 - C _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
