On 3/4/10 2:22 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote: > Malthe Borch wrote: >> On 4 March 2010 22:02, Kevin Kalupson <b...@bugs.repoze.org> wrote: >>> I wouldn't expect the the xml headers in a macro template to be applied to >>> the >>> page template being rendered. It makes no sense to me that an element not >>> contained within a macro definition would be applied to the page calling the >>> macro under any situation. >> >> I sort of agree, except how else would we provide this functionality? >> Or is it actually the case that it doesn't make sense for a macro to >> control these headers –– I suspect it is. > > From a template developer's POV, it's useful to apply the same XML > declarations throughout a site using metal.
In that case, there should be macro explicitly containing the doctype and other wanted headers. The current syntax is > non-obvious and perhaps problematic, but workable. Some other syntax > might be better, but let's not break the current syntax in the 1.1 branch. > I don't think it's a syntax issue, I think it's a behavioral issue. I think the 1.1 branch exhibits broken behavior. > Shane > > _______________________________________________ > Repoze-dev mailing list > Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org > http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev -Kevin _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
