Kevin J. Kalupson wrote: > > On 3/4/10 2:22 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote: > The current syntax is >> non-obvious and perhaps problematic, but workable. Some other syntax >> might be better, but let's not break the current syntax in the 1.1 branch. >> > I don't think it's a syntax issue, I think it's a behavioral issue. I > think the 1.1 branch exhibits broken behavior.
I'm pretty sure it was in 1.0 as well. It's a standard ZPT idiom. Shane _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev