Kevin J. Kalupson wrote:
> 
> On 3/4/10 2:22 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>  The current syntax is
>> non-obvious and perhaps problematic, but workable.  Some other syntax 
>> might be better, but let's not break the current syntax in the 1.1 branch.
>>
> I don't think it's a syntax issue, I think it's a behavioral issue.  I
> think the 1.1 branch exhibits broken behavior.

I'm pretty sure it was in 1.0 as well.  It's a standard ZPT idiom.

Shane
_______________________________________________
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev

Reply via email to