Alexey Serbin has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/21018 )

Change subject: KUDU-613: Cleanup of cache code
......................................................................


Patch Set 2:

(3 comments)

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21018/2/src/kudu/util/cache.h
File src/kudu/util/cache.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21018/2/src/kudu/util/cache.h@81
PS2, Line 81:     // Number of lookups for this entry. Used for upgrading to 
protected segment in SLRU cache.
            :     // Resets to 0 when moved between probationary and protected 
segments in both directions.
            :     uint32_t lookups;
Is it possible to introduce this field only in the patch implementing the SLRU 
cache?


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21018/2/src/kudu/util/nvm_cache.h
File src/kudu/util/nvm_cache.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21018/2/src/kudu/util/nvm_cache.h@34
PS2, Line 34: struct LRUHandle {
Any chance to unify Cache::RLHandle and this handle by templatizing?  
Alignment-related functionality might be introduced as an option (a template 
parameter).


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21018/2/src/kudu/util/nvm_cache.h@46
PS2, Line 46:   // Number of lookups for this entry. Used for upgrading to 
protected segment in SLRU cache.
            :   // Resets to 0 when moved between probationary and protected 
segments in both directions.
            :   uint32_t lookups;
Ditto: is it possible to introduce this field only in the patch implementing 
the SLRU cache?



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/21018
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I506d4577c0ae873b01d7fa4f53846d6fd0f664cf
Gerrit-Change-Number: 21018
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Mahesh Reddy <mre...@cloudera.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <ale...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins (120)
Gerrit-Reviewer: Tidy Bot (241)
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 02:31:31 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to