KeDeng has posted comments on this change. ( 
http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/21342 )

Change subject: Minor refactoring on Op class
......................................................................


Patch Set 2:

(4 comments)

Thanks for your reviews.

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21342/1//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21342/1//COMMIT_MSG@7
PS1, Line 7: class
> class
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21342/1//COMMIT_MSG@10
PS1, Line 10: Now, if we need to add time statistics for these operations, it
            : would be repetitive to add an initial timestamp separately for
            : each derived cl
> BTW, if thinking forward, when an operation completes, where are you going
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21342/1/src/kudu/tablet/ops/op.h
File src/kudu/tablet/ops/op.h:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21342/1/src/kudu/tablet/ops/op.h@111
PS1, Line 111: eplicateMsg for this op.
> Now this is confusing: the timestamp assigned to the operation is tracked b
Done


http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21342/1/src/kudu/tablet/ops/op.cc
File src/kudu/tablet/ops/op.cc:

http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/#/c/21342/1/src/kudu/tablet/ops/op.cc@33
PS1, Line 33:
> Doesn't it look quite restrictive?  This means all the operations have this
I have changed the initialization location of the timestamp as you suggested.



--
To view, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/21342
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/settings

Gerrit-Project: kudu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie391d4a55b8da08a62025a05cc466fc2b947099c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 21342
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: KeDeng <kdeng...@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexey Serbin <ale...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: KeDeng <kdeng...@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kudu Jenkins (120)
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yingchun Lai <laiyingc...@apache.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 04:35:18 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to