-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43015/#review119208
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp (line 505)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43015/#comment180480>

    What about add `containerId` in the log message?



src/tests/containerizer/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp (line 3149)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43015/#comment180482>

    s/by default/the default
    
    There are indeed patches trying to update all `by default` to `the 
default`: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42689/



src/tests/containerizer/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp (line 3160)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43015/#comment180485>

    Why not `ASSERT_EQ(1u, offers2.get().size());`? This seems more accurate


- Guangya Liu


On 二月 14, 2016, 8:38 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43015/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 二月 14, 2016, 8:38 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Jie Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3413
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3413
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fixed persistent volumes with docker tasks.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.hpp 77a50d80179672cf3c270cbdd7fa003c7d9ad6f3 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp ed1c9a551f03a37d572470e4c495f5df834198cc 
>   src/tests/containerizer/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp 
> 645bdcf095145097d8b8c65d592c787417883145 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43015/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Timothy Chen
> 
>

Reply via email to