> On April 1, 2016, 4:46 p.m., Avinash sridharan wrote:
> > src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/cni/cni.cpp, line 429
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/45571/diff/1/?file=1321722#file1321722line429>
> >
> >     You had mentioned that if we return an error during `recover` the agent 
> > will restart. This state from checkpointed information that is not 
> > changing. After restart would the Agent end up hitting this condition again 
> > ?
> 
> Jie Yu wrote:
>     Yes, but this is not possible, right? If that happens, human needs to be 
> involved.
> 
> Avinash sridharan wrote:
>     Yeah, we can't handle this condition. Should we add a `LOG(ERROR)` here 
> or would this be highlighted upstream? Wanted to see if we can explicitly 
> indicate this condition to the operator.

I think the Error message will be visible to the operator? Why you need a 
LOG(ERROR) here. The agent (or containerizer) will do the LOG(ERROR).


- Jie


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45571/#review126592
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 1, 2016, 5:36 p.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45571/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 1, 2016, 5:36 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Avinash sridharan and Qian Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4759
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4759
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> A few cleanups and simplifications in CNI isolator.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/cni/cni.hpp 
> 3a07540909ed771d1bd3b22888e04d5fb451710d 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/cni/cni.cpp 
> 486c382365d5293cd9d53b8b239f70a543c46792 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45571/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>

Reply via email to