> On Sept. 8, 2016, 2:28 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/slave/slave.cpp, line 2277
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/51477/diff/5/?file=1493928#file1493928line2277>
> >
> >     just realized that you need to set proper command info for `DEFAULT` 
> > executor here? master is not going to fill it!
> >     
> >     consequently, you need to ensure that in `doReliableregistration()` 
> > command info is unset when re-registering `DEFAULT` executor.

Good Catch! I would leave a TODO while committing and would fix it in a follow 
up JIRA issue/review.


- Anand


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51477/#review148184
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 8, 2016, 5:19 a.m., Anand Mazumdar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51477/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 8, 2016, 5:19 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6076
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6076
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This changes implements the `runTaskGroup()` handler on the
> agent ensuring that task group is sent atomically to the executor
> via the `LAUNCH_GROUP` event. It also refactors `runTask()`/`_runTask()`
> to go through a common handler function. Also, it ensures that all
> tasks in `framework->pending`/`queuedTasks` that are killed before
> running the task group result in all the tasks being killed.
> 
> Review: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51477/
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 4add4c0180ea56039e0d5009bad4d9346128bde6 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 2da5a2986c427250664b2bf3456039f86e5c6079 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51477/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anand Mazumdar
> 
>

Reply via email to