-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55910/#review163522
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp (line 283)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55910/#comment234982>

    Is this intentionally implicit? Otherwise please make this `explicit`.



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp (line 128)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55910/#comment234983>

    nit: This could be set in the member declaration.



src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp (lines 237 - 241)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55910/#comment234981>

    @gyliu: I like introducing `Framework` as a helper doing extraction from a 
`FrameworkInfo` (this is expanded on in r/55870).
    
    @bmahler: `insert` also takes an `initializer_list`, i.e.,
    
        frameworks.insert({frameworkId, Framework(frameworkInfo)});
        
    Otherwise please include `<utility>`.


- Benjamin Bannier


On Jan. 25, 2017, 3:40 a.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/55910/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 25, 2017, 3:40 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Currently, a lof of code in the allocator makes use of the `[]`
> operator to access the agents, frameworks and sorters, which
> can lead to subtle bugs where insertion was unintended.
> 
> With this change, a few const functions can be marked as such.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp 
> 9b66c23f26b37c02ed850c06c4518ea99078b02d 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 
> c2211be7458755aeb91ef078e4bfe92ac474044a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55910/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to