-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58955/#review175220
-----------------------------------------------------------



Looks pretty good. Just some questions about the v0 /logging/toggle endpoint


src/master/http.cpp
Lines 2056 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58955/#comment248656>

    Should we modify the v0 `/logging/toggle` endpoint to use this 
authorization::action instead of authorization::GET_ENDPOINT_WITH_PATH ? What's 
the compatibility/deprecation process there?



src/master/http.cpp
Lines 2062-2064 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58955/#comment248654>

    I don't care what clang-format says, this is much uglier than my preferred 
wrapping:
    ```
          [level, duration](const Owned<ObjectApprover>& approver)
              -> Future<Response> {
            Try<bool> approved = approver->approved((ObjectApprover::Object()));
    ```



src/tests/api_tests.cpp
Lines 772 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58955/#comment248657>

    Is there a v0 equivalent of this test for `/logging/toggle`?


- Adam B


On May 12, 2017, 2:28 a.m., Alexander Rojas wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58955/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 12, 2017, 2:28 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Adam B and Greg Mann.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-7414
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7414
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Enables authorization in the v1 API call `SET_LOGGING_LEVEL` following
> the existing implementation for the agent call with the same name.
> Likewise it reuses the authorizer action `SET_LOG_LEVEL`.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/http.cpp e2590a17044ac019b24a24629428d4ec8adc0c31 
>   src/tests/api_tests.cpp faf3242f9c86d866c4bb5e457fcfe47c1063cc09 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58955/diff/3/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rojas
> 
>

Reply via email to